Commie Business Discriminates Against Comedian, Lisa Jane Spencer.

When we read Orwell’s 1984 back in high school, we had no idea just how prophetic it was. In fact, it was so prophetic, it was predictive. Just recently, in the culturally enriched, politically precious, socially regressive, Banana Republic of Victoriastan where hard workers die paying taxes and people live in fear of being the next victims to (more than the occasional) machete wielding jihadists, a young comedian by the name of Lisa Jane Spencer was unfairly dismissed from her workplace.

The cause for the uproar was her latest skit wherein she identified as an Indigenous person, participating in stereotypical Aboriginal behaviour and culturally traditional practices. No one is off limits where Lisa’s concerned, which is the way it should be. She has been consistent with her skits which have a kind of South Park-esque feel to them and are in my opinion, (unlike South Park) quite wholesomely hilarious.

Many will say it is wrong to stereotype or make broad generalisations about a people, group or culture, but everyone in the real world knows stereotypes exist. Most people also understand they don’t represent every individual in that group, and can still laugh hard because elements of truth or familiarity in the jokes resonate with them.

Lisa’s comedy can be described as satirically dark humour. It is controversial and provocative because it challenges socio-cultural and political hypocrisies while exposing the issues and absurdities within. Dark satire can be offensive and uncomfortable to many but is it really necessary to dox a person’s workplace and pressure them to instantly sack and defame her? I’ve seen many “artists” and comedians mock and blaspheme Jesus but no Christian would call for their cancellation or ruination.

Unfortunately, the bleeding hearts club took this opportunity to cancel yet another hilarious comedian who dared poke her head above the parapet. Once again proving just how obsessed this world has become with “protecting minorities” from words that hurt. Imagine being the one person in the room everyone is tip-toeing around because some liberal white people are standing close by policing words, ready to pounce on anyone who might accidentally use the wrong pronoun, colour or state a wrong opinion. It would be literally exhausting for that one person to watch people get cancelled, silenced or publicly shamed on their behalf. How absolutely patronising that anyone would think them too fragile to tolerate a joke, disagreement or incapable of defending themself. The moral outrage is racist in itself.

The reality is that the Indigenous people may not want to be rescued. They might be happy to simply live their lives without constantly being portrayed as victims in need of saving. They likely have no idea they have been turned into a political cause or fundraising campaign. One need only spend some time in their communities to know that funds have not met them on the ground and whatever opportunities exist are unbeknownst to them. People are individuals, they have different ambitions, values and aspirations. For this reason, they need to be handled on a case by case basis. They don’t need a professional class of activists to continually fight and speak on their behalf.

Anyway, I digress. The people missed the point Lisa was trying to make because they could not see past their tears. So let me reiterate. The uncomfortable truths are that there are many people with little or no connection to Indigenous communities who claim to be Aboriginal, and despite decades of support, funding and government intervention, there still remains communities of Indigenous people facing serious social problems, including substance abuse. The fact that the joke offended many more than the reality that exists is telling. It is easier to feign offense than it is to actually go there, meet them where they are and do something to help.

Another valid point Lisa was making was the fact that no one blinks an eye when men dressed as women take up spaces designed specifically for biological women only, yet a white girl who might genuinely identify as an Aboriginal is labelled racist. The moral outrage is ironic to say the least, but this is the world we live in, sadly. Too many people are too busy pointing their self-righteous fingers at each other to realise their own blind spots.

I hope and pray Lisa takes this to court, pursues an unfair dismissal claim and succeeds. The hypocrisy is outrageous. In a so-called democracy like Australia, no one should have to live in fear of losing their livelihoods over a joke or hurtful words. Those celebrating her dismissal should be careful because this sets a standard of censorship which is subjective and leaves the door open for anyone to lose their job for saying something their overlords dislike. People need to grow a backbone, in Christ.

Submission to Senate Inquiry into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion

Introduction

Australia should remain a nation in which people of all religions, ethnicities, and identities can live safely and freely. Assimilation to Australian culture and society is a fundamental aspect of social cohesion. Providing education and training of Australian values, beliefs and etiquette with ongoing assessment, may contribute to positive cross-cultural understanding and safe interactions.  Obviously, violence, intimidation, harassment, and criminal acts directed toward any community, including Jewish Australians, must  be condemned and addressed by strictly enforcing the law.

Antisemitism is a serious form of prejudice that must be confronted wherever it occurs. Jewish Australians, like all Australians, deserve protection from threats, violence, and discrimination. However, the underlying issue confronting social cohesion in Australia is not limited to one form of hatred. The more fundamental challenge is violent extremism and criminal conduct, whether motivated by religious ideology, political radicalism, racial hatred, or other extremist beliefs.

Australia already possesses an extensive legislative framework to address these behaviours. The priority should therefore be effective enforcement of existing laws, education and training on Australian culture to curtail antisocial, extremist behaviours, rather than the creation of additional legislation that may unnecessarily restrict lawful speech.

Existing Criminal Law Framework

The Criminal Code Act (1995) Subdivision C already contains strong provisions addressing inciting violent extremism and incitement against groups or members of groups.

Relevant provisions include:

• Section 80.2A – Advocating force or violence against groups.

• Section 80.2C – Advocating terrorism.

• Division 101– Terrorism offences, including engaging in or preparing terrorist acts in the form of training, collecting or making documentation. Possession of material or other acts done connected to terrorist acts.

• Division 102– Offences relating to membership of or support for terrorist organisations.

These provisions provide significant legal tools for prosecuting individuals who incite or participate in violence against any group in Australia.

At the same time, protections against racial discrimination and vilification already exist under the Racial Discrimination Act (1975).

Notably:

• Section 18C makes it unlawful to perform public acts reasonably likely to offend, insult, humiliate, or intimidate individuals or groups because of race or ethnicity.

• Section 18D provides important safeguards for freedom of expression, including protections for artistic expression, academic debate, and fair comment made reasonably and in good faith.

Together, these provisions attempt to balance protection from racial harm with the preservation of democratic freedoms.

Immigration and Deportation Powers

Social cohesion is threatened when individuals engage in violent extremism or serious criminal conduct. Deportation may be appropriate within the Migration Act (1958) for the cancellation and removal of visas for non-citizens.

In particular:

• Section 501 allows the Minister to refuse or cancel a visa on character grounds, including where a person has been convicted of serious criminal offences or is considered a risk to the Australian community.

These powers already allow the government to act decisively when non-citizens engage in serious criminal conduct, including violence motivated by extremist ideology.

There are no existing laws which allow deportation of Australian Citizens. Therefore, legislation must be adjusted to include framework for deporting a person convicted of violent extremism and criminal conduct or considered a risk to the Australian community.

Freedom of Expression and Democratic Principles

Australia’s democratic framework depends upon the protection of freedom of expression.

In Victoria, these principles are reinforced through the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act (2006), which recognises:

• Section 15 – The right to freedom of expression.

• Section 16 – The right to peaceful assembly and freedom of association.

While these rights are not absolute and may be limited where necessary to protect others from harm, any new legislative restrictions should be carefully scrutinised to ensure they are necessary, proportionate, and compatible with democratic values. Overly broad restrictions on speech risk driving extremist views underground, where they may be more difficult for authorities and communities to identify and address.

Policy Considerations

While hateful rhetoric can be offensive and distressing, it is violent acts, threats, and criminal intimidation that directly endanger public safety and social cohesion. Law enforcement efforts should therefore focus primarily on those who:

• Incite violence against individuals or groups

• Engage in acts of terrorism or extremist violence

• Commit criminal damage, harassment, or intimidation

Existing criminal laws already allow authorities to prosecute such conduct effectively.

Recommendations

1. Prioritise enforcement of existing criminal provisions under the Criminal Code Act (1995), particularly those relating to incitement to violence and terrorism offences.

2. Maintain the current balance within the Racial Discrimination Act (1975) including protections against racial harm alongside the free expression safeguards in section 18D.

3. Ensure individuals who commit violent acts, threats, intimidation, or terrorism are prosecuted and incarcerated under existing criminal law.

4. Where non-citizens engage in serious extremist violence or criminal conduct, utilise deportation powers available under the Migration Act (1958), including visa cancellation under section 501 where appropriate.

5. Where Australian citizens engage in or are convicted of violent and/or extremist criminal conduct or considered a threat to the Australian way of life, legislation should exist for their deportation.

6. Provide new migrants with ongoing training and education on Australian values and etiquette to ensure cultural assimilation to reinforce social cohesion.

7. Exercise caution before introducing new speech-restricting legislation, ensuring any reforms are compatible with rights recognised under instruments such as the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act (2006).

Conclusion

Australia should remain a society in which all communities, including Jewish Australians, can live safely and without fear of violence or intimidation. Racism, bigotry, and violence are major threats to social cohesion and must be firmly rejected.

However, the most effective response lies in strong enforcement of existing criminal and immigration laws, rather than the creation of additional legislation that may unnecessarily restrict freedom of expression. By upholding the rule of law while protecting democratic freedoms, and ensuring ongoing education, training and assessment, Australia can safeguard both community safety and the open society that underpins its democratic institutions. It also acts as a deterrent for future extremists.

The focus of policy responses should therefore remain on preventing violence, prosecuting offenders, protecting all communities, including Jewish Australians and banning likely offenders from entry into Australia, while preserving the democratic freedoms and values that underpin Australian society.

Parasitic Pollies Bite Off More Than They Can Chew

It has been said that the Liberal Party is a broad church, but it seems to be more like the Synagogue of Satan representing all that is wrong with Australia. Founded in 1944 by Robert Menzies to provide for the “forgotten people” of Australia, the middle men who felt underrepresented by Labor and large corporations. Its core ideologies were lower taxes, social conservativism, secure borders and rural productivity. Despite its name, it was center-right, mostly traditional and largely nationalistic, if only on paper.

Today, we have a Liberal Party which resembles the Labor Party but without balls. It is the fake and gay metaphorical tranny. It sits in parliament with no power, strength or conviction and it leaches off the Australian people much like a parasite. One example, is the Deeming v Pesutto case where Pesutto was ordered to pay $2,308,873.11 in court costs. Jeff Kennett former leader of the Liberal Party has since managed to convince the parasites to cover the cost as a “loan” so Pesutto doesn’t fall into bankruptcy and is not kicked out of the parasitic club of low testosterone pathetic excuses of men.

Why Kennett even had a say is beyond comprehension. As far as anyone is concerned, the guy is irrelevant. Retired on taxpayer funds, he should be sunning himself on a beach somewhere on the Cayman Islands, not sticking his nose into business that has nothing to do with him. Instead of making Pesutto suffer the consequences of his stupid actions, like rich permissive parents to their spoilt little child, they have hauled out the safety net to catch him before he falls further into disrepute.

You sound angry Margo. Yes I am angry. Everyone should be angry. Australian pollies sold Australia out years ago and they continue to do so for their immediate benefit and self-indulgent lifestyles. All these good for nothing parasites do is find ways to extort more money from the people whilst it continues to increase debt and foreign immigration. They are a clear example of how toxic parents leave no inheritance for their children or children’s children. In doing so, they are crippling actual loving and hard-working people from moving forward and being able to provide for their own families. With every stupid decision, and financial mishap, the average Australian suffers blowback.

Australia has become an open air prison wherein imports from third world holes reign terror on suburban streets and in shopping centres with impunity. The only thing parliamentary parasites can do is call for the banning of potential weapons of mass destruction, when they should be deporting those criminals back to where they came from. The impotent Liberal Party is largely to blame. They stand for nothing, and are too busy racking up debt for the people because they are too busy tearing itself apart from within. Instead of acting as a strong opposition, it lies in wait pouncing on the scraps leftover after government expenditure, hoping enough is collected to pay for their next overseas trip and retirement fund.

It’s time we look at reducing government by dismantling the Liberal Party altogether as we already live under a totalitarian dictatorship. The Labor Party enacts laws and makes up rules according to its own evil desires and they cannot be stopped because there’s no one to stop them. It is high time the people admit, there is no opposition. The parasites are in each others’ pockets and the only ones who suffer through their decisions are the people. I dare anyone to tell me vote for the lesser evil again. There is only one political solution and that is Jesus Christ.

Woe to the wicked! It shall be ill with him,
For the reward of his hands shall be given him.
As for My people, children are their oppressors,
And women rule over them.
O My people! Those who lead you cause you to err,
And destroy the way of your paths.”

(Isaiah 3:11-12, NKJV)

Parasites In Parliament Gnaw At The Hands That Feed Australia.

Convoys of fire trucks filled with Country Fire Authority (CFA) volunteers, farmers, and career firefighters from Gippsland to Horsham, and Wagga to Warnambool flocked to Melbourne’s CBD along with thousands of supporters to gather outside Victoria’s Parliament House on Tuesday, May 20, 2025, to protest the newly introduced Emergency Services and Volunteers Fund (ESVF) levy.

The levy is set to replace the existing Fire Services Property Levy (FSPL) from July 1, 2025, which aims to fund a broader range of emergency services. This new levy (ESVF) is predicted to more than double compared to the previous (FSPL) and is dependent on a property’s Capital Improved Value (CIV).

The rally itself was a success if only managing to bring the people together. For the first time in a long time, Melbourne’s CBD was rich with testosterone and felt wonderfully safe. Men in uniform stood like gentlemen, watching as politicians made promises they knew they couldn’t keep. It was truly heartbreaking to hear the people chanting passionately, “Scrap the Tax”. The vulnerable and honorable most affected by government incompetence and financial mismanagement, told stories of life on the farm and of working as volunteers. The dedication, commitment and courage required in no way exists in the House of Parliament. Today, we have a bureaucracy that exists to destroy lives, threatening to tax them into oblivion.

The people are angry and mainly concerned by the increased financial strain on already struggling farmers and rural communities. Not only do they have to contend with the introduction of this new levy by the parasitical Labour Government, but Victorian farmers and rural communities are currently facing a drought while feeling pressure from the state to meet renewable energy goals. As we speak, they are already rolling out a program to impose transmission lines on private properties in rural Victoria. The people literally have no water, while Jacinta Allen calls for them to drink wine. She has been doing nothing but gnawing at the very hands that feed Australia.

There are also concerns that the spirit of Australia is being lost to unionized and government-backed career firefighters and emergency service employees. The CFA in Victoria, Australia, was established in 1945 to create an organized, volunteer-based rural firefighting service. Its main aims are to protect lives and property from fire and other emergencies, promote fire safety education and prevention, and assist in major emergencies like floods, car accidents, and industrial incidents. It is one of the largest volunteer-based services worldwide. This should stand as a credit to our country, and highlight Australia’s community spirit of resilience and mateship. It is a community which for years has supported itself through fundraising, donations, community support and corporate grants. They don’t need government’s hand in their pockets, nor do they need its interference.

Firefighters and emergency service workers are determined to keep the rallies continuing for as long as necessary or until government abolishes the tax. It is a sad day indeed when the bread and butter of our country feels forced to threaten food from leaving the farms as an effort to pressure fat cats in parliament to meet their requests. Let’s hope and pray it never comes down to that.

Also published on https://www.theunshackled.net/rundown/parasites-in-parliament-gnaw-at-the-hands-that-feed-australia/

The Sacred Rainbow-Coloured Cow Strikes Again. Victoria’s 6.8 Million Dollar Gay Pride Festival.

If you haven’t hired a team of people who are of color, female, and/or LGBT to actively turn over every stone, to scope out every nook and cranny, to pop out of every bush, to find every qualified underrepresented founder in this country, you’re going to miss out on a lot of money when the rest of the investment world gets it.
~ Arlan Hamilton

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arlan_Hamilton

Recently, the Andrews Government budgeted almost seven million dollars of Victorian taxpayers’ money over 4 years towards an annual two-month Pride Festival. It is to begin this December after the state election and in the lead-up to the Christmas season and throughout the summer school holidays. The sacred rainbow-colored cow has gone crazy with pride. Breaking out of the proverbial closet, it is ready to buck at anything that moves.

Difficult as it is to believe, Homosexuality and Homosexual acts used to be illegal in Australia as recently as the late 20th Century. In 1975, South Australia was the first state to decriminalise it. Believe it or not, there was a time when sexual perversion was not tolerated. Open sexual displays of affection, even from heterosexual couples was unacceptable. “Get a room!” was the cry of the majority, because honestly, unless one is sick in the head, those acts should be reserved for the intimacy of ones bedroom. Today, however, they have more than their fair share of rights and legalised sodomy laws. A far cry from yesteryears gone by.

Unfortunately, due its increasing powers, it has become an offence to disagree with and/or speak out against their lifestyles. Any attempts at refusing to do their bidding or even refusal to celebrate their ways, is considered offensive and will not be tolerated. The LGBTQIA+ tolerance has its own boundaries and don’t anyone dare cross it, as many individuals have recently discovered.

Over the last few years alone, politicians, medical experts, sportsmen, and ordinary citizenry have come under fire for daring to speak against or exercise their freedom of conscience. Katherine Deves, an Australian lawyer who ran as a Liberal candidate in this year’s federal election, was victimised simply for recognizing biological facts. In standing against trans women in women’s sports, she was forced to apologise twice to the perpetually offended class. Israel Folau, a Rugby league football legend was crucified and cancelled for daring to express his religious beliefs on his personal platform. British doctor David Mackareth, was sacked for refusing to call a patient by his preferred pronoun. Most recently, Australian political activist Neil Erikson, is sentenced to forty days imprisonment for words spoken out at a gay fake church.

https://youtu.be/yeNu85BnQqo

Certainly anyone speaking out against the LGBTQIA+ powerhouse has nothing against individuals who live that lifestyle. Ask the majority of people their opinions and they don’t care. Live and let live is the attitude of most. However, the rainbow fascists have no intentions of allowing people who hold such views to live freely. They want to take over and won’t be happy until the whole world is at their footstool.

Already they have so many rights and opportunities to do and say whatever they please. They are widely accepted and tolerated. Diversity and inclusion workplace laws are in place for whoever might feel a little slighted by “violent” words. The whole world is forced to endure their overt, degenerate images. Even children are not safe from their ideology as unisex toilets continue to crop up at even Christian schools all around the country.

This summer we are about to endure mass pornographic imagery on a large scale, parade itself unashamedly before an unwitting, unprepared or confused audience. All this funded by our governments, and paid for with our taxes. One could be walking down the street, when suddenly images of half naked men, or trans women, dancing sensually, could appear before yours or (God forbid) your children’s eyes.

Such an event occurred once annually. This year we have had to endure street parties, parades, and Mardis Gras, all year round. From inner city Melbourne right through to regional Victoria. From “Wear Purple Day” to “Intersex Awareness Day” to “Transgender Day of Remembrance”, the days are accumulating. Christmas and summer will no longer be the same. Gone are the days when families could enjoy a trip to the city to enjoy G-Rated, summer nights and Christmas lights. Instead, they will be faced with X-Rated, sexualised images of debauchery and lewd acts.

It is great LGBTQIA+ community is no longer physically attacked and treated like criminals. They even have their same-sex marriages recognized. They are free to do what they like with their bodies. But at what point does one group’s rights start to encroach and impinge on anothers’? We are facing the beginning of the end when Christian Heterosexuals are no longer free to practice their faith, without being subjected to blatant sexual images, or vexatious litigation. Two months of pride will become a mandatory daily pride fest. Look out if you or your children are not found on bended knees at the sacred cow’s altar.

**Also published on https://www.theunshackled.net/rundown/rainbow-fascism-strikes-again-victorias-68-million-dollar-pride-festival/